Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Iain McCorquodale's avatar

I currently have these zooms:

8-25 f4

12-100 f4

40-150 f4

75-300 f4.6-6.7 II

That a lot of lenses and a lot of overlap.

I mainly shoot landscapes and pictorial shots. Any wildlife has been horses in paddocks and the 75-300 has been good enough (-ish). Now I'm thinking that the 50-200 can replace the 12-100, 40-150 and 75-300, eliminating the redundancy and lightening my bag. Do you think that sounds realistic?

Expand full comment
Ian's avatar

I have my own lens, arrived just two days ago. Totally concur with the observations you make, including that using the x2 convertor requires a bit more work to get the best results. The 'icing on the cake' for me would be the presence of a focus clutch; as a long term actual user of the 40-150 f2.8 I used the clutch extensively.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts